Given that we’re said to live in an Information Society, the idea that an entire Nation could succumb to a form of mass hysteria similar to medieval delusions of sacrilege and infanticide would normally be unthinkable. The Canadian scandal involving the Kamloops child deaths, which kept all of Canada on edge for quite some time, exemplifies such an incident—a moral panic that led the Canadian Prime Minister, in a display of national shame, to lower the country’s flags to half-mast. And because the public held the Catholic Church responsible for the alleged murders, Pope Francis was also asked to apologize—a request he humbly fulfilled during a six-day penitential pilgrimage to Canada. The fact that the affair eventually faded away did not, of course, lead to a full reckoning—and this is precisely why we should turn our attention to this question of how such a moral panic could have emerged in the Information age. It was Tom Flanagan who caught our attention because, as a political scientist, he has published two books on the subject (along with others); additionally, he is not only a recognized expert on Canadian colonial history but also has a deep familiarity with how politics operate, thanks to his long tenure as an advisor to Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
Tom Flanagan taught political science at the University of Calgary until his retirement. His academic interests centered on Canadian Indigenous peoples, especially the Métis, who, led by the millenarian Louis Riel, initiated a rebellion against the Canadian government in 1885. Alongside his academic pursuits, Flanagan also served as a political consultant and columnist for major Canadian newspapers.
Tom Flanagan has recently puplished
Related Content
Sociosis
When I try to explain in conversation the extent of the fall that accompanies the loss of reality, I repeatedly find myself referring to a subtle distinction that Sigmund Freud discussed in his seminal work The Loss of Reality in Neurosis and Psychosis
Talking to ... Maarten Boudry
When Nietzsche asks in Ecce Homo: »Who among the philosophers before me was a psychologist, rather than the opposite, a ‘higher swindler,’ an ‘idealist’?« it naturally raises the question of whether it is still possible to practice Philosophy in the traditional, time-honored way today. Maarten Boudry, who as a young man was faced with the choice of beco…
Postmodern Demonology
If, when reflecting on the fatalities of today's culture wars, with its encroachments and infringements by self-appointed language police, we're reminded of George Orwell, of his logic of Oldspeak and Newspeak, thoughtcrime and the Ministry of Truth, it's no coincidence. Like few others before him, Orwell grasped the abysses of totalitarian thinking. He…
Downwards!
When we speak of totalitarianism, we often conjure up this image of an all-powerful, fearsome state: a portrait of the Leviathan, drawn as a monster! Franz Neumann, the unfortunately forgotten political scientist, provides us with a structural analysis of Nazi rule that brings a very different perspective into relief – one that’s extr…
